Shaw v. Conway
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the CourtMehaffy, J.
The appellant filed suit in the Faulkner Chancery Court, stating that he was a master plumber engaged in the general plumbing business in the city of Little Bock, Arkansas, under the firm style and name of Shaw Gras & Plumbing’ Company; that he is an experienced plumber, and employs experienced and high-class men, and, in compliance with the laws of the State of Arkansas, city of Little Bock, paid privilege tax for 1928, and obtained license from the city of Little Bock, which gave him a right to maintain an office in said city, to do a general plumbing business during the year. That he…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Sander v. BlythevilleSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1924
- City of Fayetteville v. CarterSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1889
- City of Texarkana v. Hudgins Produce Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1914
- Kirby v. ParagouldSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1923
- Newport v. YoungSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1927
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- City of Little Rock v. LinnSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1968
- Baldwin v. City of BlythevilleSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1948
- Opinion No., Arkansas Attorney General Reports2003