Legal Opinion
Metaullics Systems Co., L.P. v. Paul v. Cooper and Molten Metal Equipment Innovations, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided November 15, 1996No. 96-1290PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Order for the court filed by Circuit Judge MAYER. Opinion concurring in part filed by Circuit Judge LOURIE.
*939 ORDER
MAYER, Circuit Judge.
Metaullics Systems Co., L.P. (Metaullics) appeals from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio’s denial of its motion for a preliminary injunction against Paul Y. Cooper and Molten Metal Equipment Innovations, Inc. (together, MMEI), Metaullics Systems Co., L.P. v. Cooper, No. 96-CV-554 (N.D.Ohio March 28, 1996). Metaullics sued MMEI for infringement of U.S. Patent No. 4,169,584 (’584 patent), which expired on October 2, 1996.
The only…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Illinois Tool Works, Inc. v. Grip-Pak, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
- Oakley, Inc. v. International Tropic-Cal, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
- Johns Hopkins University v. CellProDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1996
3Cited by12 opinions
- Cybor Corporation v. Fas Technologies, Inc., and Fastar Ltd., Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- The Gillette Company v. Energizer Holdings, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- International Communication Materials, Inc. v. Ricoh Company, Ltd., and Ricoh CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
- VIVID TECHNOLOGIES INC. v. American Science & Engineering, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1997
- Maxwell Technologies, Inc. v. Nesscap, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 2007
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.