Paul Boudreaux v. Mississippi Shipping Company, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Per curiam
Appealing from a judgment on the verdict of the jury in favor of the defendant, the plaintiff is here assigning as error that the jury’s verdict was contrary to the law and the evidence.
Appellee, insisting that the jury’s verdict is amply supported on the record, points out that there was no motion for a directed verdict, nor any objection to the giving or the failure to give an instruction. So pointing it urges upon us that the assigned error presents nothing for our consideration under the plain provisions of Rule 50(b) and Rule 51 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A., and…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- George W. Whiteman v. Elsoyd PitrieCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1955
- Minnehaha County, SD v. KelleyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1945
- Baten v. Kirby Lumber CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1939
- Glendenning Motorways, Inc. v. AndersonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1954
- Woodbridge v. Du PontCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1943
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Frank Pruett v. Robert Ellington MarshallCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1960
- Eleonora R. Sears v. Hartmann H. Pauly, Hartmann H. Pauly v. Eleonora R. SearsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1958
- James Moore v. Louisville & Nashville Railroad Company, Inc., Lee Hill v. Louisville & Nashville Railroad Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1955
- Edgar W. Stokes v. Continental Assurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1957
- La France v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1961
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.