Legal Opinion

Gaus, Admr. v. Penna. Rd. Co.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided February 16, 1937PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By THE COURT

Under the provisions of §§10509-138 and 10509-167, GC, the sections under which this action was instituted, an action for wrongful death must be brought in the name of the personal representative of the deceased person for the exclusive benefit of the surviving spouse, the children and other next of kin of the decedent, and the jury may give such damages as it may think proportionate to the pecuniary Injury resulting from such death, to the persons respectively, for whose benefit the action is brought. Funeral expenses of the decedent not being a pecuniary injury resulting…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Detroit, Toledo & Ironton Rd. Co. v. RohrsOhio Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Knisely v. Community Traction Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1932

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Rodney v. StamanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
  2. Moss v. Hirzel Canning Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1955
  3. McManus v. BuskirkVinton County Court of Common Pleas · 1962
  4. Barcus v. Union Hospital Ass'nTuscarawas County Court of Common Pleas · 1965
  5. Rodney v. StamanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API