Legal Opinion

City & Borough of Sitka v. Construction & General Laborers Local 942

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided May 7, 1982No. 5774/5811PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

COMPTON, Justice.

This is an appeal from the judgment of the superior court which held that a timber sale contract executed between Alaska Lumber and Pulp Co., Inc. (ALP) and the City and Borough of Sitka (Sitka) was subject to the provisions of Alaska’s “Little Davis-Bacon Act,” AS 36.05.010.110. The logging and related clearing took place on land Sitka owned and upon which the Green Lake Hydroelectric Project, a dam, was to be built. The superior court further held that pursuant to a stipulation negotiated by the parties, the Unions were entitled to an award of damages. We affirm.

I.…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Case v. Los Angeles Lumber Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
  2. Universities Research Assn., Inc. v. CoutuSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Walsh v. SchlechtSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. United States v. Binghamton Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1954
  5. Marks v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1972

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Everett Concrete Products, Inc. v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Dayhoff v. Temsco Helicopters, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Board of Trade, Inc. v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1998
  4. DeSalvo v. BryantAlaska Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Alaska State Federation of Labor v. State, Department of LaborAlaska Supreme Court · 1986

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API