City & Borough of Sitka v. Construction & General Laborers Local 942
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
COMPTON, Justice.
This is an appeal from the judgment of the superior court which held that a timber sale contract executed between Alaska Lumber and Pulp Co., Inc. (ALP) and the City and Borough of Sitka (Sitka) was subject to the provisions of Alaska’s “Little Davis-Bacon Act,” AS 36.05.010.110. The logging and related clearing took place on land Sitka owned and upon which the Green Lake Hydroelectric Project, a dam, was to be built. The superior court further held that pursuant to a stipulation negotiated by the parties, the Unions were entitled to an award of damages. We affirm.
I.…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Case v. Los Angeles Lumber Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Universities Research Assn., Inc. v. CoutuSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Walsh v. SchlechtSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- United States v. Binghamton Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Marks v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1972
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Everett Concrete Products, Inc. v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1988
- Dayhoff v. Temsco Helicopters, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1993
- Board of Trade, Inc. v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1998
- DeSalvo v. BryantAlaska Supreme Court · 2002
- Alaska State Federation of Labor v. State, Department of LaborAlaska Supreme Court · 1986
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.