Legal Opinion

Pratt v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided June 30, 1932No. 3 Div. 717PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBricken, P. J.

This appeal presents a single question: Is a stockholder in an incorporated bank in Alabama liable in a civil suit against him for the ad valorem tax assessed against his stock in the bank, when the assessment was made for the tax year beginning October 1, 1929, and the bank failed on February 21, 1930, without having paid the tax?

This case was tried in the court below upon the following agreed statement of facts:

“It is agreed by and between the plaintiff and the defendant in the above styled cause that the following facts shall be agreed and submitted and shall be taken as true, as fully and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. City of Huntsville v. Madison CountySupreme Court of Alabama · 1910
  2. Commissioners Court v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911
  3. Jefferson County Savings Bank v. HewittSupreme Court of Alabama · 1896

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Roberts v. GunterSupreme Court of Georgia · 1983
  2. School District of Lansing v. City of LansingMichigan Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Smith v. BurtonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1968
  4. Pratt v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API