Legal Opinion

Engines Southwest, Inc. v. Kohler Co.

District Court, W.D. Louisiana

Decided May 16, 2005No. Civil Action 03-1460PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM RULING

HICKS, District Judge.

This matter is before the Court on cross motions for summary judgment [Doc. Nos. 9 & 83]. Plaintiff Engines Southwest, Inc’s (“ESW”) motion asserts that it is entitled to summary judgment because the Louisiana Wholesaler Act (“Wholesaler Act”) requires good cause and a 60 day period to cure provision before cancellation of any contract. Defendant Kohler Co.’s (“Kohler”) motion contends that ESW is not a protected party under the Wholesaler Act, and that the contract was properly terminated pursuant to the contract provisions. For the following reasons,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Lake Charles Diesel, Inc. v. General Motors Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2003
  3. New York Life Insurance v. Travelers InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
  4. International Harvester Credit v. SealeSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1988
  5. Cherokee Pump & Equipment Inc. v. Aurora PumpCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Servicios Azucareros De Venezuela, C.A. v. John Deere Thibodaux, Inc.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API