West v. Sirian Lamp Co.
Court of Chancery of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
Harrington, Chancellor:
In the original bill, the complainants sought to cancel the entire issue of the no par common and voting stock of the corporation:(1) Because the original 30,000 shares of no par common stock, exchanged for the present issue of 300,000 shares, *330were not authorized by the pertinent provisions of the General Corporation Law or by the charter of the Sirian Lamp Company, and were, therefore, void;(2) Because the original 30,000 shares of no par common stock, exchanged for the present outstanding issue of 300,000 shares, were issued without “any legal or valid consideration…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Finch v. Warrior Cement Corp.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1928
- Ellis v. Penn Beef Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1911
- Diamond State Brewery, Inc. v. de la RigaudiereCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1941
- Eastern States Petroleum Co. v. Universal Oil Products Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1938
- West v. Sirian Lamp Co.Superior Court of Delaware · 1944
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Hodson v. Hodson Corp.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1951
- Elster v. American Airlines, Inc.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1954
- Hodson v. Hodson Corp.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1951
- Elster v. American AirlinesCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1954
- Smith v. Biggs Boiler Works Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1952
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.