Legal Opinion

People Ex Rel. City of Chicago v. Barrett

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided February 21, 1940No. 25482. Writ deniedPublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stone

This is an original petition for mandamus to require respondent, the Auditor of Public Accounts, to register certain notes issued by the Governor, the State Treasurer and the Auditor, in conformity with a certain act of the legislature known herein as Senate Bill No. 184, enacted by the Sixty-first General Assembly, directing that those public officials issue and sell from time to time, notes payable from a county’s or municipality’s share of the motor fuel tax fund, authorized to be collected by the State during the years subsequent to the enactment of Senate Bill No. 184 and prior to July…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Eitel v. LindheimerIllinois Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Reif v. BarrettIllinois Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Alabama State Bridge Corporation v. SmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
  4. Winter v. BarrettIllinois Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Bush v. MartineauSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1927

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Gruen v. State Tax CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Witzenburger v. State ex rel. Wyoming Community Development AuthorityWyoming Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Routt v. BarrettIllinois Supreme Court · 1947
  4. State Office Bldg. Commission v. TrujilloNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Loomis v. KeehnIllinois Supreme Court · 1948

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API