Legal Opinion
Shreve v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided November 9, 1934No. 7460PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
WILBUR, Circuit Judge.
Daniel II. Shreve asks leave to file a petition for writ of mandamus against Albert M. Sames, United States District Judge for the District of Arizona, commanding him to rescind an order made with relation to the settlement of the hill of exceptions striking certain matters out of the petitioners’ proposed bill of exceptions. The application is denied. The writ of mandamus cannot be used to control the discretion of the trial judge in settling a bill of exceptions. In re Bradstreet, 29 U. S. (4 Pet.) 102, 105, 7 L. Ed. 796; In re Richardson (C. C. A.) 30 F. (2d) 687;…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Ex Parte Martha Bradstreet in the Matter of James Jackson Ex Dem. Martha Bradstreet v. Daniel ThomasSupreme Court of the United States · 1830
- Scaife v. Western North Carolina Land Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1898
- Dunagan v. Appalachian Power Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1928
3Cited by1 opinion
- Walker v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1940