Legal Opinion

Armco Steel Corp. v. State Industrial Court

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided July 26, 1977No. 50344PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DAVISON, Justice:

Petitioner, hereafter respondent, seeks to vacate an order, awarding additional compensation for change of condition for the worse, for asserted lack of competent medical evidence to support the order.

The issue arises from respondent’s interpretation of meaning and application of State Industrial Court Rule 23, (85 O.S. *100Supp.1976 Ch. 4, Appdx.) which provides motion based upon change of condition for the worse shall be supported by a doctor’s report showing substantial change of condition. The Rule also provides:

“* * * a motion to reopen claimant’s case under an award for…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Dye v. Ed Johnston Grain CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1957
  2. Wood v. Oklahoma Osteopathic HospitalSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1973
  3. Bryant-Hayward Drilling Company v. CookSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1971
  4. Wasson v. Tulsa Dairy SuppliesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1957

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. National Zinc Co., Inc. v. DewittSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1978
  2. Ed Wright Construction Co. v. McKeySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1979
  3. Blue Bell, Inc. v. McKaySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API