Hamby v. Thomas Realty Associates

RUDMAN, Justice.

Thomas Realty Associates (“Thomas Realty”), a limited partnership, appeals from an order of the Superior Court (Androscog-gin, Alexander J.), denying its motion to set aside the entry of a default pursuant to M.R.Civ.P. 55(c), and from the final judgment entered thereon. On appeal, the defendant argues that the Superior Court abused its discretion and applied the wrong legal standard when it denied the motion to set aside the entry of a default. We affirm the judgment of the Superior Court.

Thomas Realty asserts that Thomas Realty’s default should be excused because Thomas…