Legal Opinion

Nowery v. Smith

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided May 21, 1947No. 9333PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

The question presented is whether the plaintiff, a seaman, was entitled to maintenance and cure by reason of an injury suffered without fault on his part in a fight in a barroom while on shore leave in¡ a foreign port. For the reasons well stated in the opinion of. Judge Bard in the district court, 69 F.Supp. 755, denying the-defendant’s motion for judgment n. o. v. and for a new trial we think that the-award of maintenance and cure was-proper.

The judgment of the district court will! be affirmed.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Nowery v. SmithDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1946

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Warren v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1947
  2. Keefe v. American Pac. S. S. Co.District Court, S.D. California · 1953
  3. Koistinen v. American Export Lines, Inc.City of New York Municipal Court · 1948
  4. Murphy v. LightCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1954