Legal Opinion
Rigopoulos v. Kervan
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided November 29, 1943PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LEIBELL, District Judge.
This is a motion under Rule 60(a), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c, to compel the clerk of the court to amend a judgment rendered in this court February 18, 1943, affirmed November 15, 1943, by the Circuit Court of Appeals, 140 F.2d 506, as to eight of the plaintiffs and slightly modified as to two of them, by including average interest on all ten awards herein.
The action was brought under the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, 29 U.S. C.A. § 201 et seq., for unpaid liquidated damages as to eight of the plaintiffs, and for unpaid…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Overnight Motor Transportation Co. v. MisselSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Rigopoulos v. KervanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1943
- Massachusetts Benefit Assn. v. MilesSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Northwestern Yeast Co. v. BroutinCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1943
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Howard S. Lee, Eric Lee and Lester Lee v. Joseph E. Seagram & Sons, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
- Merry Queen Transfer Corp. v. O'RourkeDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1967
- State ex rel. Henry v. BrittOhio Supreme Court · 1981
- Cannon v. MillerWashington Supreme Court · 1945
- Greenberg v. Arsenal Bldg. CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.