Legal Opinion
McFarlane v. Masonry
Supreme Court of The Virgin Islands
Decided March 9, 1990No. Civil No. 691/1988PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFinch, Judge
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
I. INTRODUCTION
This matter comes before the Court on defendant Jones Masonry’s (hereinafter “Jones”) motion for summary judgment and plaintiff’s (hereinafter “McFarlane”) motion to remove defendants’ *45counsel. For the reasons articulated below, both motions will be denied.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
On August 3, 1989, McFarlane instituted an action sounding in contract against Jones and co-defendant Nathaniel Hobson (hereinafter “Hobson”). McFarlane alleged in the complaint that both Jones and Hobson breached a settlement agreement which was executed by the parties.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Childers v. JosephCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
- Dhanraj v. Potomac Electric Power Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1986
- Utah International, Inc. v. Caterpillar Tractor Co.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1989
- Dhanraj v. Potomac Electric Power Co.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1985
3Cited by3 opinions
- Antonio Williams v. Joseph Rene Esso Virgin Islands, Inc. Scott Drake John Doe, Third-Party Esso Virgin Islands, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
- Paul v. Abramson Enterprises, Inc.Superior Court of The Virgin Islands · 2016
- Williams v. ReneCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995