Legal Opinion

Utah International, Inc. v. Caterpillar Tractor Co.

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided February 21, 1989No. 10137PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MINZNER, Judge.

Plaintiffs appeal from the district court’s order granting defendant’s motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim. Plaintiffs’ amended complaint sought tort damages under theories of strict liability and negligence for injury to a coal hauler which plaintiff Utah International bought from defendant.

Defendant contended in its motion to dismiss that plaintiffs’ losses were not recoverable in a tort action. We agree.

We hold that between parties in a commercial setting, when there is no large disparity in bargaining power, economic loss'arising from a product injuring…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. East River Steamship Corp. v. Transamerica Delaval Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Seely v. White Motor Co.California Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Santor v. a & M KARAGHEUSIAN, INC.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1965
  4. Pennsylvania Glass Sand Corporation v. Caterpillar Tractor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
  5. Spring Motors Distributors, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1985

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Trans States Airlines v. Pratt & Whitney Canada, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Pratt & Whitney Canada, Inc. v. SheehanAlaska Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Spectron Development Laboratory v. American Hollow Boring Co.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1997
  4. In Re Consol. Vista Hills LitigationNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Cooperative Power Association v. Westinghouse Elec. Corp.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1992

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API