Legal Opinion

United States v. Baker

U S Air Force Court of Military Review

Decided January 13, 1992No. ACM S28387PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

HODGSON, Senior Judge:

This was a bench trial, and after the court was closed for deliberation on findings, the trial judge discovered the word “rental” on a ski that was the subject of the larceny allegation.1 Concerned by his discovery, he contacted another judge about what to do. As a result of this discussion, he reopened the court, informed counsel for both sides that he had spoken with a fellow judge, and proposed pursuing the matter further. There was no objection by either party.

Appellate defense counsel question “the propriety of [a] judge’s communications with an…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. DuBayUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1967
  2. Gaston v. HunterCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1978
  3. United States v. RogersUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1964
  4. United States v. RheaU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1990

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. FoleyU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API