Legal Opinion

McCleary v. Broaddus

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 9, 1910No. Civ. No. 742PublishedCited by 3 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Modoc County, and from an order denying a new trial. John E. Raker, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtBurnett, J.

The action was brought to quiet title to a certain mining claim in Modoc county, known as the “Mountain Sheep Mining Claim.” The defendants contend that the land is included within their locations, known as the Evening Star, White Quartz and Klondyke mining claims, and the determination of the case involves the question of prior location and appropriation as to the respective claimants and whether up to the time of the trial plaintiffs had done everything required of them by law to maintain the validity of their claim. In reaching a conclusion -favorable to plaintiffs, the trial court found…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Erhardt v. BoaroSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  2. Donahue v. MeisterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Carter v. BacigalupiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Anderson v. CaugheyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1906
  5. Eaton v. NorrisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Franz v. FranzCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1926
  2. Velasco v. MalloryCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1967
  3. Crane v. FrenchCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API