Petrie v. Torrent
Michigan Supreme Court
Appeal from Muskegon. (Dickerman, J.) Argued January 22, 1894. Decided April 17, 1894. Bill for an accounting. Both parties appeal. The facts are stated in the opinion, and in 88 Mich. 43.
1Opinion of the CourtMcGrath, C. J.
Both parties appeal from an accounting under a decree affirmed in 88 Mich. 43. The facts respecting the original agreement and the decree thereon are so fully set forth in that opinion that it is unnecessary to reiterate.
It is clear that the expenses incurred by either party *118prior to the purchase were not to enter into any computation afterwards made; that defendant was to furnish the capital, buy and sell the property; that complainant was to receive for his expenses incurred prior to the purchase, and for his services, one-third of the profits; that defendant, in consideration of the use of…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Petrie v. TorrentMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
3Cited by3 opinions
- Tuttle v. BristolMichigan Supreme Court · 1905
- Nester v. SullivanMichigan Supreme Court · 1907
- Petrie v. TorrentMichigan Supreme Court · 1895