Legal Opinion

Skirvin v. Coyle

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 16, 1939No. 28581PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WELCH, V. C. J.

The order tested by this appeal appointed a general receiver, pending this litigation, of the properties, books and records, of the defendant American Oil & Refining Company, an Oklahoma corporation, and hereinafter referred to as the “Oklahoma Corporation.” The defendants (plaintiffs in error here) raise two Questions in the following language:

“The court committed error in appointing a receiver and refusing to vacate the order.
“First. For that the record shows that the federal court had appointed a receiver of the identical property and that Mr. Fletcher, the federal receiver,…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Bergman Clay Manufacturing Co. v. M. L. BergmanWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Hickey v. Parrot Silver & Copper Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Sapulpa Petroleum Co. v. McCrayCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1925
  4. Carey v. Dalgarn Const. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1930
  5. Checotah Hardware Co. v. HensleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Coyle v. SkirvinCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1942
  2. McNeal v. HauserSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1949
  3. TRUETT v. FREEDOM LEAFCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2021
  4. Coyle v. SkirvinDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1941
  5. Shoemaker Corporation III, Inc. v. GarrettDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API