Legal Opinion
Skirvin v. Coyle
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided May 16, 1939No. 28581PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WELCH, V. C. J.
The order tested by this appeal appointed a general receiver, pending this litigation, of the properties, books and records, of the defendant American Oil & Refining Company, an Oklahoma corporation, and hereinafter referred to as the “Oklahoma Corporation.” The defendants (plaintiffs in error here) raise two Questions in the following language:
“The court committed error in appointing a receiver and refusing to vacate the order.
“First. For that the record shows that the federal court had appointed a receiver of the identical property and that Mr. Fletcher, the federal receiver,…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Bergman Clay Manufacturing Co. v. M. L. BergmanWashington Supreme Court · 1913
- Hickey v. Parrot Silver & Copper Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1901
- Sapulpa Petroleum Co. v. McCrayCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1925
- Carey v. Dalgarn Const. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1930
- Checotah Hardware Co. v. HensleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Coyle v. SkirvinCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1942
- McNeal v. HauserSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1949
- TRUETT v. FREEDOM LEAFCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2021
- Coyle v. SkirvinDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1941
- Shoemaker Corporation III, Inc. v. GarrettDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2023