Legal Opinion
Subryan v. Regents of the University of Colorado
District Court, D. Colorado
Decided February 19, 1993No. Civ. A. 81-K-1860PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION . AND ORDER
KANE, Senior District Judge.
This is an action under Title VII, § 1983 and Title VI based on employment discrimination. Plaintiff Vibart Subryan claims that the Regents of the University of Colorado and three administrators (collectively, “the University”) terminated his employment as a senior instructor at the School of Medicine because he is black. The University moves to dismiss or for summary judgment, claiming that Subryan’s Title VII claim is barred by laches. The University also argues that Subryan’s § 1983 claim is barred by res judicata and the defendant…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Migra v. Warren City School District Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Cannon v. University of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Woodward v. City of WorlandCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Cowan v. Ernest Codelia, PCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2001
- Brooks v. Bank of BoulderDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1995
- Gehl Group v. KobyDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1993
- Baird v. Long (In Re Baird)District Court, D. Colorado · 1993