Legal Opinion

In Re IAC/InterActiveCorp Securities Litigation

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided March 21, 2007No. 04 Civ. 7447(RJH)PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

HOLWELL, District Judge.

INTRODUCTION

Pending before the Court are three related suits brought against IAC/InterActi-veCorp (“IAC” or the “Company”) and certain directors and high-ranking officers. Plaintiffs in the first suit represent an uncertified class of investors who purchased or otherwise acquired IAC publicly traded securities between March 31, 2003, to August 3, 2004 (“class period”), including former shareholders of companies whose stock was exchanged for IAC stock. The other two suits are shareholder derivative actions that the Court has consolidated with…

2Cases cited65 opinions

  1. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Basic Inc. v. LevinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. Dura Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. BroudoSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  5. Charles Kowal v. MCI Communications CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1994

60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. In re Lululemon Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2014
  2. Freudenberg v. E Trade Financial Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2010
  3. Glaser v. The9, Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 2011
  4. Doubleline Capital LP v. Odebrecht Fin., Ltd.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018
  5. In Re Gildan Activewear, Inc. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2009

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API