Legal Opinion

Whitehurst v. . Gotwalt

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 29, 1925PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStacy, C. J.

The case was heard on the evidence submitted and facts agreed, with the stipulation that the court might find further facts from the evidence in the case, if necessary to a final determination of the rights of the parties. A jury trial was expressly waived.

On the hearing the interests and rights of the respective parties were properly made to depend: first, upon the validity; and,, second, if valid, upon the rightful interpretation of the following clause in the will of D. E. Bradford:

“I do hereby and herein instruct and demand of my executrix, that if any attempt is made on the part of any…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Smithsonian Institution v. MeechSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  2. Estate of HiteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Donegan v. WadeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1881
  4. Yorkly v. . StinsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1887
  5. In Re Will of MillerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1912

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Heyer v. BulluckSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
  2. Heyer v. . BulluckSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
  3. Calvery v. CalveryTexas Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Commerce Trust Company v. WeedSupreme Court of Missouri · 1958
  5. Gordon v. . EhringhausSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API