Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Brice
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Dissent
Cardamone and Callahan, JJ. (dissenting).
We dissent. We previously affirmed a Special Term ruling in this case granting a preference and permitting Aetna’s actions for declaratory judgment to proceed before a jury on the issue of consent (Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co. v Lauria, 54 AD2d 183). At that time, we noted that defendant Brice in his answer denied that his vehicle was being operated without his consent. Subdivision 1 of section 388 of the Vehicle and Traffic Law provides that every owner of a vehicle is liable and responsible for death or injury to another person or property resulting from…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Leotta v. PlessingerNew York Court of Appeals · 1960
- Arcara v. MoresseNew York Court of Appeals · 1932
- Blunt v. ZinniAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1969
- Blunt v. ZinniNew York Court of Appeals · 1970
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. LauriaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.