Legal Opinion · Dissent

Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Brice

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 16, 1979Published

1Dissent

Cardamone and Callahan, JJ. (dissenting).

We dissent. We previously affirmed a Special Term ruling in this case granting a preference and permitting Aetna’s actions for declaratory judgment to proceed before a jury on the issue of consent (Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co. v Lauria, 54 AD2d 183). At that time, we noted that defendant Brice in his answer denied that his vehicle was being operated without his consent. Subdivision 1 of section 388 of the Vehicle and Traffic Law provides that every owner of a vehicle is liable and responsible for death or injury to another person or property resulting from…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Leotta v. PlessingerNew York Court of Appeals · 1960
  2. Arcara v. MoresseNew York Court of Appeals · 1932
  3. Blunt v. ZinniAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1969
  4. Blunt v. ZinniNew York Court of Appeals · 1970
  5. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. LauriaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API