Legal Opinion

Coyle v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided March 3, 1914PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtLoring, J.

This is an action on a bond by which the defendant fidelity and guaranty company agreed to make good to the plaintiff any and all loss sustained by him through any act of dishonesty on the part of one Mudge, called in the bond an “Employe” of the plaintiff.

The defendant rested on the plaintiff’s evidence and asked the presiding judge * to direct a verdict in its favor. This was refused. An exception taken to that ruling is the only exception before us.

We are of opinion that, although the evidence showed acts on the part of Mudge which the jury could have found to be dishonest, they were not…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Guaranty Co. v. Pressed Brick Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1903
  2. Griswold v. HazardSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  3. Barnes v. Century Savings BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1910
  4. Commonwealth v. MooreMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1896
  5. Jungk v. HolbrookUtah Supreme Court · 1897

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Treasurer & Receiver General v. Massachusetts Bonding & InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API