Legal Opinion

Taylor v. Hake

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided March 6, 1933No. 12,729PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Butler

Leonard Taylor, Edward Pierson, S. Sugitani and G-. Hongo, called herein the defendants, seek the reversal of a judgment against them and in favor of C. W. Hake, T. N. Willis, Alfred Peterson and W. M. Harmon, called herein the plaintiffs.

The plaintiffs and the defendants were stockholders of the Lafayette Farmers Union Elevator Company, a corporation, called herein the Union Company. That company became indebted to the Mercantile Bank and Trust Company, called herein the bank, upon promissory notes given for money borrowed from the bank to carry on the business of the Union Company. The bank…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Burkhardt v. HaycoxSupreme Court of Colorado · 1894
  2. Asmussen v. Post Printing & Publishing Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1914

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. United States v. Julius C. Immordino and Joanne Immordino, and Third-Party v. Joseph C. Costa, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
  2. Simpson v. MilneColorado Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. Extreme Construction Co. v. RCG Glenwood, LLCColorado Court of Appeals · 2012
  4. Stieben v. KorbyColorado Court of Appeals · 1975
  5. Armstrong v. ArmstrongDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1990

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API