Legal Opinion

State v. Swope

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided November 19, 2008No. 2007AP1785-CRPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ANDERSON, PJ.

¶ 1. Craig A. Swope appeals from his conviction for two counts of intentional first-degree homicide. He claims that the trial court erred in permitting an FBI agent to testify about a "death scene" analysis that he conducted. First, Swope asserts that "death scene" analysis is a "junk science," and the agent was not qualified to give an expert opinion. Second, he argues that the admission of the agent's conversations with third parties violated his confrontation rights. We reject his claims and affirm. The admission of the agent's expert testimony met the standards of the…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  3. Frye v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
  4. In RE MARRIAGE OF COOK v. CookWisconsin Supreme Court · 1997
  5. State v. SullivanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1998

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Andrew J. Kyllonen v. Artisan and Truckers Casualty CompanyCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2025
  2. Hildebrand v. Town of MenashaCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2011
  3. Wallace v. WoodfordCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API