Legal Opinion

Tidewater Railway Co. v. Cowan

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided March 27, 1907PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Error to a judgment of the Circuit Court of Montgomery county in a condemnation proceeding. To the judgment awarding damages to the defendant, plaintiff assigns error.

1Opinion of the CourtCardwell, J.

This writ of error and supersedeas brings under review a judgment of the Circuit Court of Montgomery county, affirming the report of commissioners assessing damages to the defendants in error by reason of the proposed construction through and upon their property of plaintiff in error’s line of railway, certain yards, chutes, etc.

It appears that the defendants in error own a tract of land— ■spoken of by witnesses as “a magnificent farm,” “one of the best in Southwest Virginia,” “one of the best I have ever seen”—lying in Montgomery county, and extending for five miles along Hew river, on the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Shoemaker v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  2. Swift & Co. v. City of Newport NewsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1906
  3. Roanoke City v. BeekowitzSupreme Court of Virginia · 1885
  4. Hite v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1898
  5. Richmond, Petersburg & Carolina Railroad v. Chamblin & ScottSupreme Court of Virginia · 1902

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Appalachian Power Co. v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1923
  2. State Highway & Transportation Commissioner v. Lanier Farm, Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1987
  3. Hunter's Administrator v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1907
  4. Town of Galax v. WaughSupreme Court of Virginia · 1925
  5. United States v. BeatyDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 1912

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API