Legal Opinion

Linde v. Arab Bank, PLC

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided May 14, 2013No. 04-cv-2799 (NG)(VVP)PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

NINA GERSHON, District Judge:

Defendant Arab Bank moves under Rule 44.1 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure “to submit evidence of foreign law.” That Rule provides:

A party who intends to raise an issue about a foreign country’s law must give notice by a pleading or other writing. In determining foreign law, the court may consider any relevant material or source, including testimony, whether or not submitted by a party or admissible under the Federal Rules of Evidence. The court’s determination must be treated as a ruling on a question of law.

I have previously rejected the Bank’s…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Insurance Corp. of Ireland v. Compagnie Des Bauxites De GuineeSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Frank Stevenson v. Union Pacific Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2004
  3. Linde v. Arab Bank, PLCCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2013
  4. Linde v. Arab Bank, PLCDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2011

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Linde v. Arab Bank, PLCDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2015
  2. In re CUSTOMS AND TAX ADMINISTRATION OF THE KINGDOM OF DENMARK (SKATTEFORVALTNINGEN) TAX REFUND LITIGATIONDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API