Legal Opinion
Linde v. Arab Bank, PLC
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided December 6, 2011No. 04 CV 2799(NG)(VVP)PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
NINA GERSHON, District Judge.
By order dated January 21, 2011, this court granted plaintiffs’ request that the parties be allowed to file motions to exclude expert witnesses on the grounds of relevancy and prejudice, based upon their initial reports, prior to the submission of rebuttal reports or depositions. Plaintiffs now seek to exclude 16 of the defendant’s 20 expert witnesses. This order does not address the banking experts Anne T. Vi-tale and Paul Allan Schott, who will be considered at the conference scheduled for December 19, 2011 at 2:30 p.m., but does address the remaining 14…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Holder v. Humanitarian Law ProjectSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- United States v. RahmanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
- In Re Rezulin Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2004
- Humanitarian Law Project v. RenoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Marvel Worldwide, Inc. v. KirbyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2011
3Cited by3 opinions
- Linde v. Arab Bank, PLCDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2015
- Linde v. Arab Bank, PLCDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2013
- Linde v. Arab Bank, PLCDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2013