Legal Opinion
Thompson v. Sessions
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided October 3, 2017No. Civil Action No. 2016-0003PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
AMENDED MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
RANDOLPH D. MOSS, United States District Judge
Plaintiff David Thompson, proceeding pro se, brings this action against his former employer, the U.S. Department of Justice, for alleged violations of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (“Title VII”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e et seq., the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (“ADEA”), 29 U.S.C. §§ 633a et seq., the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment, and the Freedom of Information Act (“FOIA”), 5 U.S.C. § 552. Thompson claims that the Department unlawfully discriminated against him on the basis of his…
2Cases cited52 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Clayton v. Dist. of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2019
- BEARER v. TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2021
- Clayton v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2019
- Kurtiev v. ShellDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2020
- McCullough v. SessionsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2019
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.