Legal Opinion

Dial v. Bond

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided October 25, 2002No. 2011008PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Russell Dial appeals from a judgment establishing a boundary line between his property and property owned by Jack Bond, a coterminous landowner. We affirm.

Dial has title to the east half of the northeast quarter of section 15, Township 18 north, Range 4 west. Bond has title to the northwest quarter of section 14, Township 18 north, Range 4 west. Both men acquired their property by deed and by will from family members.

Dial sued Bond, contending that the boundary line between their properties is not the United States government survey line between sections 14 and 15, but some point to the east…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. McNeil v. HaddenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1954
  2. Alford v. RodgersSupreme Court of Alabama · 1942
  3. Watson v. PriceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1978
  4. Mims v. Alabama Power CompanySupreme Court of Alabama · 1955
  5. Valentine v. IrelandSupreme Court of Alabama · 1991

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. NORTH CLARKE WATER AUTHORITY v. DockeryCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2008
  2. Jacks v. TaylorCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2008
  3. Williams v. Laubenthal Land & Timber Co.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API