Legal Opinion
In re Mcghee
California Court of Appeal, 5th District
Decided April 29, 2019No. A153721PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPollak, P. J.
*836*905We confront another attempt by the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (the department) to curtail the right created by Proposition 57 of numerous inmates to parole consideration by the Board of Parole Hearings (the board). Proposition 57, The Public Safety and Rehabilitation Act of 2016, added a provision to California's Constitution stating: "Any person convicted of a nonviolent felony offense and sentenced to state prison shall be eligible for parole consideration after completing the full term for his or her primary offense." ( Cal. Const., art. I, § 32, subd.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- People v. ValenciaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2017
- In re LawrenceCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
- California Cannabis Coalition v. City of UplandCalifornia Supreme Court · 2017
- Ontario Community Foundation, Inc. v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
- In re Edwards, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- In re GadlinCalifornia Supreme Court · 2020
- In re Arroyo, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- (PC) Ramos v. SpearmanDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2019
- (PC) Williams v. California Department of CorrectionsDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2019
- Alliance for Constitutional etc. v. Dept. of Corrections etc.California Court of Appeal · 2020
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.