Legal Opinion

Wessinger v. Southern Railway Co.

District Court, D. South Carolina

Decided February 6, 1979No. Civ. A. 76-1372, 77-2407PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HEMPHILL, District Judge.

This matter comes before the court for decision, in the form of defendant’s Motion In Limine. Said motion contains five points, three of which have already been resolved in a hearing held January 23, 1979. The remaining points, points two and five, are the subject of this Order.

This is a diversity action instituted August 2, 1976 as the result of a train — automobile collision that occurred on October 10, 1974, at about 11:10 p. m. at a railroad crossing near the city limits of Lexington, South Carolina. By Order issued on January 5, 1978, Harold W. Wessinger’s claim…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Reed v. ReedSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis Railway v. WaltersSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  3. Mickle v. BlackmonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1969
  4. Ford v. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1932
  5. Georgia Southern & Florida Ry. Co. v. SEVEN-UP BOTT. CO. SE GEORGIASupreme Court of Florida · 1965

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Bierkamp v. RogersSupreme Court of Iowa · 1980
  2. Langley v. BoyterCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984
  3. Ramey v. RameySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1979
  4. Bierkamp v. RogersSupreme Court of Iowa · 1980
  5. Ramey v. RameySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1979

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API