Freidberg v. Cox
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
PUGLIA, P. J.
In this action for malicious prosecution, plaintiff appeals from a summary judgment entered on motion of defendant. The sole issue on appeal is whether the action allegedly prosecuted maliciously by defendants was terminated favorably to plaintiffs and appellants. We conclude it is not and shall therefore affirm.
The instant action is the third in a series of related lawsuits which began with a case entitled Ritter v. Bard. Taggert Ingraham is an attorney and a defendant in the action in which this appeal is taken. Ingraham represented Ritter in an action by Ritter against…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- In Re Marriage of FlahertyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- Bertero v. National General Corp.California Supreme Court · 1974
- Albertson v. RaboffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- Babb v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Jaffe v. StoneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Crowley v. KatlemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
- Sierra Club Foundation v. GrahamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
- Skrbina v. Fleming Companies, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1996
- Staffpro, Inc. v. Elite Show Services, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2006
- Lanz v. GoldstoneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.