Legal Opinion
LMS Holding Co. v. Core-Mark Mid-Continent, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided March 16, 1995No. 94-5130PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BALDOCK, Circuit Judge.
Coremark and Ameon (“Coremark”) appeal the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Retail Marketing Company (“RMC”). The district court held that Coremark did not have a perfected security interest in RMC’s after-acquired inventory. We exercise jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and affirm.
In 1988, MAKO, Inc. (“MAKO”), a chain of convenience stores, granted Coremark a security interest in its inventory, after-acquired inventory, and inventory proceeds. Core-mark perfected its security interest by fifing a financing statement naming MAKO as the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Citizens Savings Bank v. Sac City State BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1982
- Eaton v. Jarvis Products Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
- In the Matter of Charley Paul McClain Bankrupt. Fred W. Woodson, Trustee v. Utica Square National Bank of TulsaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1971
- In Re Taylorville Eisner Agency, Inc.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 1977
- Steinberg v. American National Bank & Trust Co. of Chicago (In Re Meyer-Midway, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 1986
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Morris v. Hicks (In Re Hicks)Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
- Drewes v. Security State Bank of Wishek (In Re Nies)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. North Dakota · 1995
- Budsberg v. Premier Credit Co. (In Re Kincaid)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Washington · 1998
- In Re Lms Holding CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
- In re Aquatic Pools, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Mexico · 2017
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.