Legal Opinion

Bauer v. Prestwich

Utah Supreme Court

Decided April 21, 1978No. 15233PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ELLETT, Chief Justice:

This appeal involves the right to use the water from a spring on land owned by the respondents (hereafter called Bauer). The water from this spring had been used continuously by Bauer and his predecessors in interest since before 1903 and, therefore, Bauer asserts a “diligence claim” to the water.1

The appellants (hereafter called Prestwieh) also claim a diligence right, but they were unable to show that the initial use of water prior to 1903 was ever conveyed to Prestwieh. In fact, the one upon whose use Prestwieh seeks to show his right is the one whose use went to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Cortella v. Salt Lake CityUtah Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Bishop v. Duck Creek Irr. Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1952

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Sanpete America, LLC v. WillardsenUtah Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Utah State Eng'r v. Johnson (In Re Utah Lake & Jordan River)Court of Appeals of Utah · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API