Legal Opinion

Centimark Corporation v. Brycen Ribordy and Cherry Coatings Management, LLC

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided December 4, 2025No. 2:25-cv-00987Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA CENTIMARK CORPORATION, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 2:25-cv-987 v. Hon. William S. Stickman IV BRYCEN RIBORDY and CHERRY COATINGS MANAGEMENT, LLC, Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION WILLIAM S. STICKMAN IV, United States District Judge On July 15, 2025, Plaintiff Centimark Corporation (“Centimark”) filed a complaint against defendants Robert Ribordy (“Ribordy”) and Cherry Coatings Management, LLC (“Cherry Coatings”) (collectively, “Defendants”). Centimark’s complaint alleges the following: a breach of contract claim…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  5. Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API