Lewis v. Trinklein
Michigan Supreme Court
1DissentWibst, J.
I cannot concur in the opinion of Mr. Justice Boyles.
The corporation was dissolved, a receiver was appointed and sale of the assets of the corporation authorized by the court. The sale was made in 42 par cels and plaintiff Lewis purchased the registered trade names, trade marks, some patents and signs but none of the other physical assets of the corporation.
A trade name exists as an incident of the business in which it was lawfully acquired and with which it remains identified as a mere abstract right, having no reference to any particular property, commodity, or business. It cannot exist…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Hanover Star Milling Co. v. MetcalfSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- United Drug Co. v. Theodore Rectanus Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918
- American Steel Foundries v. RobertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Herring-Hall-Marvin Safe Co. v. Hall's Safe Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1908
- The Children's Bootery v. SutkerSupreme Court of Florida · 1926
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.