Legal Opinion

English v. Anderson

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided June 10, 1905PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from Sharp Circuit Court, Western District. John W. Meeks, Judge. The remarks of counsel for appellee were highly improper. 44 Wis. 282; 48 Ark. 106; 58 Ark. 368, 473; 61 Ark. 130; 63 Ark. 174; 6 Ark. 626; 70 Ark. 179, 305; 67 Ark. 366, 516; 74 Ark. 256.

1Opinion of the CourtHire, C. J.

The appellant English sued appellee, Anderson, alleging that Anderson as his tenant failed to cultivate his farm in a husbahdlike manner, in violation of the contract of rental; that he injured his orchard by allowing cattle to break into and eat the branches, and break down the trees, and that he suffered the trees to be cut, broken down, etc., and that he burned the rails from his fences, and polluted his cistern, and did other specific acts of injury, for which he prayed damages, specifying the amount of each item. Anderson denied all allegations of injury, and the issues were tried before…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Kansas City Southern Railway Co. v. MurphySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1905
  2. Day v. FergusonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1905

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Choctaw, Oklahoma & Gulf Railroad v. CraigSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1906

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API