Kansas City Southern Railway Co. v. Murphy
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Appeal from S'evier Circuit Court. The remarks of appellee’s counsel were improper. 70 Ark. 306; 58 Ark. 368; 61 Ark. 138; 48 Ark. 106. The court erred in refusing to instruct a verdict for appellant. 67 Ark. 514.
1Opinion of the Court
Him,, C. J.
This is a suit for damages for the alleged negligent killing of a mule by a train of the appellant rail-'oad company. The evidence fully sustains the verdict of the jury against the railroad company, and the instructions were in form and substance in conformity to the decisions of this court on the questions involved, and therefore no useful ■ purpose would be conserved in discussing either the facts or instructions. The only question in the case which calls for hesitation in affirming the judgment is the argument of appellee’s counsel.
In stating the case preliminary to the…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Vaughan v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1894
- Holder v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1894
- Bennett v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1896
- Little Rock & Fort Smith Ry. Co. v. CavenesseSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1886
- Magness v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1899
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by66 opinions
- Wicks v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1980
- Green v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2006
- McCoy Farms, Inc. v. J & M McKEESupreme Court of Arkansas · 1978
- Lard v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2014
- Adams v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1928
61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.