Legal Opinion

Salt Lake City v. Christensen

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided November 29, 2013No. 20121017-CAPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Decision

2Per curiam

{ 1 Celestial Christensen appeals her convictions of assaulting a police officer and interfering with an arrest. We affirm.

$2 Christensen asserts that there was insufficient evidence to support the jury's verdict. In reviewing a jury verdict, an appellate court evaluates the evidence and all reasonable inferences in the light most favorable to the verdict. State v. Fedorowicz, 2002 UT 67, ¶ 40, 52 P.3d 1194. Additionally, it is assumed that the jury believed the evidence supporting the verdict. Id. Also, appellate courts generally will not reevaluate the credibility of witnesses. Id.…

3Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. WorkmanUtah Supreme Court · 1993
  2. State v. FedorowiczUtah Supreme Court · 2002
  3. State v. LuceroCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2012
  4. State v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2011

4Cited by1 opinion

  1. Herzog v. Vail ResortsCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API