Legal Opinion
Carlos v. Patenaude & Felix, A.P.C.
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided April 27, 2020No. 3:14-cv-00921Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON BRIAN CARLOS, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, Case No. 3:14-cv-00921-MO v. OPINION AND ORDER PATENAUDE & FELIX A.P.C., Defendant. MOSMAN, J., Following years of litigation, the parties reached an agreement on October 3, 2019, in which Plaintiff (“Mr. Carlos”) was awarded $15,000 and reasonable costs and attorney fees, as agreed by the parties or determined by the court. Am. J. [ECF 135]. The parties did not reach an agreement on the amount of attorney fees, and Mr. Carlos filed the Corrected…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Kerr v. Screen Extras Guild, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
- Camacho v. Bridgeport Financial, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Scott Fischer v. sjb-p.d. Inc., a California Corporation, Dba Cedar Creek Inn Svenja Bienlefeld Michael ViliunasCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Juan Manuel Morales v. City of San Rafael and Daniel HulettCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- H.N. Dang v. Gilbert CrossCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.