Legal Opinion

State v. London

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided May 27, 1960PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSiddall, J.

The respondent was indicted and convicted of the crime of manslaughter following the death of another in an automobile accident. The State claimed that the re spondent was the operator of a vehicle in which the person killed was a passenger. The respondent seasonably filed a motion for a new trial. The motion was denied and respondent appealed.

One of the issues raised in the case now before us is whether or not P. L., 1957, Chap. 333, Sec. 2, hereafter called either the reckless homicide statute or the later statute, repeals or supersedes in part R. S., 1954, Chap. 130, Sec. 8, hereafter…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. State v. WrightSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1929
  2. People v. GarmanIllinois Supreme Court · 1952
  3. State v. GloydSupreme Court of Kansas · 1938
  4. State v. BudgeSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1927
  5. State v. MorfArizona Supreme Court · 1956

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. JonesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981
  2. State v. GibsonCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1968
  3. Thomas v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1977
  4. State v. AndersonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1979
  5. Edwards v. St. Louis CountySupreme Court of Missouri · 1968

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API