Legal Opinion
Bennet v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided August 6, 1996No. 5:94-CV-006Published
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF OPINION
O’MALLEY, District Judge.
The defendant in this case, State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, has moved for partial summary judgment, (docket #40), on the ground that the plaintiffs claim regarding the allegedly discriminatory denial of health insurance benefits to her is moot. For all of the reasons set forth more fully below, the defendant’s motion for partial summary judgment is GRANTED in part only and is, otherwise, DENIED.
I. Factual Background
The plaintiff in this case, who suffers from bipolar affective disorder, brings her claims under the Americans with…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Carey v. PiphusSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,768 Phil A. Street and Clyde H. Street v. J.C. Bradford & CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
- Frito-Lay, Inc. v. Barton Willoughby, D/B/A Willoughby FarmsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1988
- Fulson v. City of ColumbusDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1992
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.