Rouse v. United States
District Court, W.D. Oklahoma
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Case No. CR-18-260-SLP ) CIV-22-689-SLP CHELSEA ROUSE, ) ) Defendant. ) O R D E R Before the Court is Defendant Chelsea Rouse’s pro se Motion Under
28 U.S.C. § 2255
to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence by a Person in Federal Custody [Doc. No. 2858]. The Government has responded [Doc. No. 2864] and the matter is at issue. Upon review and for the reasons that follow, the Motion is DENIED. I. Factual and Procedural History On April 18, 2019, Defendant entered a guilty…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Slack v. McDanielSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Roe v. Flores-OrtegaSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- United States v. HerringCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2019
- Coronado v. WardCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.