Legal Opinion

United States v. Herring

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided August 27, 2019No. 18-4023PublishedCited by 76 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EBEL, Circuit Judge.

Lawrence Herring appeals from the denial by the district court of his motion to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. We granted a certificate of appealability to determine whether the district court erred in denying, without a hearing, Herring's claim that his trial counsel's failure to consult with him about an appeal constituted ineffective assistance of counsel.1 We exercise *1106jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1291 and 2253(a). We conclude that the district court abused its discretion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255(b) by failing to hold an evidentiary…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Roe v. Flores-OrtegaSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Garza v. IdahoSupreme Court of the United States · 2019
  4. United States v. Orlando MoraCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002
  5. Everett Lee Baker v. Stephen Kaiser, Warden and Attorney General of the State of OklahomaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by76 opinions

  1. United States v. FieldsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2019
  2. State v. AmmonsNebraska Court of Appeals · 2022
  3. Alvarez-Ronquillo v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2022
  4. Andes Capital Financing LLC v. Crossed Keys LLCDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2022
  5. Antimo, LLC v. Brendan ReichDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2025

71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API