Legal Opinion

General Motors Co. v. DiNATALE

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided July 20, 2010No. Case 09-14445PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO REMAND AND DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS OR TRANSFER VENUE

DAVID M. LAWSON, District Judge.

As part of its benefits plan, plaintiff General Motors Company (GM) maintains a program that grants vehicle purchase discounts to its employees, retirees, and their families who buy a new GM vehicle. Defendant Eugene DiNatale is a GM retiree residing in Maryland who, GM alleges, availed himself of that program several times between 2003 and 2007 to obtain vehicle discounts for twenty-two unspecified people. When DiNatale failed to respond to an audit and…

2Cases cited45 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Innovative Production Systems, LLC v. Hoskin & Muir, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API