Legal Opinion

Maury v. State

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 29, 1922No. 1 Div. 255PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAnderson, C. J.

Schedule 70 of the Acts' of 1919 requires -a license tax of all persons, firms, and corporations whose principal business is lending money. The only other part of the act which provides for the payment of a tax by people who lend money is schedule 101, Acts 1919, p. 430, which is as follows:

“Each person, firm or corporation engaged in buying, selling or renting real estate on commission, when such real estate is situate in this state shall pay the state the following license tax; in cities and towns of ten thousand inhabitants and over, fifteen dollars; in cities and towns of less than ten…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. City Council v. KellySupreme Court of Alabama · 1904
  2. Alabama Consolidated Coal & Iron Co. v. HerzbergSupreme Court of Alabama · 1912
  3. State ex rel. Greenwood v. NolanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1909
  4. Beckett v. Mayor of SavannahSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  5. Mefford v. City of SheffieldSupreme Court of Alabama · 1906

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Woco Pep Co. of Montgomery v. City of MontgomerySupreme Court of Alabama · 1925
  2. Ex Parte MelofSupreme Court of Alabama · 1999
  3. Tucker v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1925
  4. Woco Pep Co. of Montgomery v. City of MontgomerySupreme Court of Alabama · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API