Legal Opinion

In re the Claim of Rose

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 15, 2008PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed December 22, 2006, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because his employment was terminated due to misconduct.

Substantial evidence supports the decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board denying claimant’s application for unemployment insurance benefits because he lost his employment as a result of disqualifying misconduct. The record *1236establishes that claimant was involved in a two-vehicle accident while driving a company vehicle. Although claimant was…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of GoldmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  2. In re the Claim of SarfatiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of CarterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  2. Matter of Cunningham (Commissioner of Labor)Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API